A good lab report does more than present data, it requires
a student to think in depth and detail about material and demonstrates
the writer's comprehension of the concepts behind the data. Merely
recording the expected and observed results is not sufficient. Students
should also identify how and why differences occurred, explain how they
affected the experiment, and show understanding of the principles the experiment
was designed to examine. Bear in mind that a format, however helpful,
can not replace clear thinking and organized writing. Students will
need to organize ideas carefully and express them coherently. While
labs for each class may differ slightly in mechanics or format, the goal
of a lab report remains the same: document findings and communicate
their significance.
Return to Top of page
General
Lab Report Format -Click here for printable handout-
Think of the report as a scientific essay. It will contain the the
following sections:
TITLE:
The title should summarize, as specifically as possible, the subject of the
lab.
Back to Lab Report Format
PURPOSE: A single, concise
statement of the major objective(s) of the lab that answers one of the following:
What question or questions is this lab exercise designed to answer?
OR What is this lab exercise designed to show
or prove? OR What hypothesis is this lab exercise
trying to prove or disprove? Note: To make a hypothesis, you must
be able to provide support for that hypothesis, based upon your knowledge
or literature research. A hypothesis should be an EDUCATED prediction!)
Back to Lab Report Format
PROCEDURE: This paragraph should not be included unless you have been asked to explain your procedure. If asked, you should include the information necessary to allow someone to repeat what you did, such as:
Return to Top of
page
Sample Scoring Guide
-Click here
for printable handout-
Your lab report grade will depend on completeness, scientific accuracy and insight, organization, and writing skills. I expect lab reports to be written neatly and legibly in ink, or prepared using modern word-processing programs, and to follow the format of the handout you received in class. You will also be graded on: Your ability to complete the lab exercise (I will be watching...); Your thoroughness in cleaning-up afterwards (I will check...); And on overall neatness, proper grammar, and correct spelling in the lab report.
The point totals for each section are for a 100 point report. For 50 or 150 point reports points will be adjusted proportionally.
1. Title. (10 points)
The title should summarize, as specifically as possible, the subject of the lab.
2. Purpose. (20 points)
The Purpose should put the experiment into context and provide the reader with information necessary to understand the scientific basis of the experiment and the techniques used.
3. Data (25 points)
This section should include all raw data, including units, and appropriate graphs.
4. Discussion (30 points)
Discuss the experiment and the results obtained. This does not mean you simply report the results again, but rather interpret and discuss their significance. Include a section containing a summary of the final data, presented in a form that is most useful for interpreting the results and sample calculations of each type used. A short paragraph should be sufficient, along with any relevant charts and graphs labeled well. Remember to title and provide legends for all graphs and tables. The graphs and tables should be comprehensible independently of their association with the text. Significant results should also be stated explicitly in verbal form. If problems were encountered during the course of the experiment, how might they be rectified in the future? Are there any other things we could do to make this a better experiment or to more specifically address the initial question(s) posed? Are there any better techniques available that would allow one to more accurately generate data? Is there more than one way to explain the results? Your results may support your initial hypothesis, but there may be more than one conclusion that could be drawn from your results. Lastly, do not spend enormous amounts of time explaining data that cannot be explained!
5. Conclusion. (15 points)
Summarize your results, the main points of your discussion, and how they relate to your stated purpose of the lab. No discussion, explanation, or speculation should appear in this section.
6. Reference Citations
As required in all scientific literature, statements of fact, not considered "common" knowledge, must be properly referenced. Give complete citations of all literature cited in the report.
What's complete? Here are some examples:
Articles in Journals:
Marmur, J. 1961. A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic
acid from microorganisms.
J. Mol. Biol. 3:208-218.
Articles in Books:
Coakley, W.T., A.J. Bates and D. Lloyd. 1977. Disruption
of bacterial cells. p279-341. In A.H.
Rose and D.W. Tempest (ed.), Advances in Microbial Physiology,
Vol. 16. Academic
Press, London and New York.
Return to Top of page
Used in a unit on Fractals. Student pairs investigated drawings of various linear fractals to examine the following hypothesis: Is it possible for a geometric shape (fractal) with a finite area to have an infinite perimeter?
A two-day enrichment activity on Chaos used in a series of Honors Algebra lessons on random and recursive iterations, and strange attractors. Student groups of three investigated the following hypothesis: Will repeated completely random data choices result in a recognizable, ordered pattern? The data was generated and tested using both manual and electronic means, then the results of the two methods were compared.
Used in a unit on ratio and proportion. Student groups of three or four simulated the Capture-Recapture method of numbering a population used by Fish and Wildlife personal. Guiding Question: Is this an accurate method for numbering a population?